> While you might be able to reduce the space required for either one, I'd > first toss the BSSID from the default output for scan-wifi. Sacrilege > to us networking professionals, I'm sure, but to the average user, it's > just a bunch of numbers that don't have meaning, and it's over 20% of > your output "budget".
I'm wary of doing that -- I know a lot of people leave their ESSID's set to the default value, leaving the BSSID as an increasingly necessary discriminator. Even though one could (and should) use "-o bssid" to see the BSSID at that point, I think the more likely reaction is to presume that there's a bug afoot. -- meem
