> Meem> As previously discussed, they will be able to get that with "-o all"; > Meem> surely that's not too painful? > > While "-o all" is not bad in an absolute sense, in a relative sense, it is > not as user-friendly as "-v", nor anywhere near as common.
As I previously pointed out, ZFS has also adopted the "-o all" convention. It seems a reasonable convention to me for applications that support "-o". Having both "-o all" and "-v" is possible but deeply offends the minimalist in me. -- meem
