On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 11:38 PM, William D Clinger <[email protected]> wrote: > Concerning the syntax bug (ticket #637 [1]), I wrote: >> This bug is Larceny-specific. Andre van Tonder's macro >> expander is not at fault. > > I think I was wrong about that. > > I have checked in a possible fix that passes all my tests > but may still not be right. Please let me know of any > more bugs you find.
I updated svn this morning and recompiled larceny from scratch, following the rather complex compilation procedure that worked the first time, but now it seems I have corrupted the heap file or something like that. Probably I did something wrong, but I am at work now and I cannot check. Maybe Derick will report back. P.S. indeed Larceny is the Scheme implementation with the more baroque installation procedure I have seen. Using PLT 4.0 as boostrap compiler did not work, so I had to install the Larceny binaries to be able to build the svn version. I would make an effort to support PLT as bootstrap compiler, since PLT is the implementation with the easier installation procedure ever, since it comes as prepackaged with many Linux distributions (at least with Ubuntu and Fedora). _______________________________________________ Larceny-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ccs.neu.edu/bin/listinfo/larceny-users
