On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Michele Simionato <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 11:38 PM, William D Clinger <[email protected]> wrote: >> Concerning the syntax bug (ticket #637 [1]), I wrote: >>> This bug is Larceny-specific. Andre van Tonder's macro >>> expander is not at fault. >> >> I think I was wrong about that. >> >> I have checked in a possible fix that passes all my tests >> but may still not be right. Please let me know of any >> more bugs you find. > > I updated svn this morning and recompiled larceny > from scratch, following the rather complex compilation procedure > that worked the first time, but now it seems I have > corrupted the heap file or something like that. > Probably I did something wrong, but I am at work > now and I cannot check.
It turns out I was using the wrong LARCENY_ROOT. It looks like all my test involving sweet-macros are passing, except the ones using ``format``, since I have yet to convert them using Derick's suggestion. If don't hear from me, assume everything is all right! Another implementation conquered in my path for the Scheme world domination ... _______________________________________________ Larceny-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ccs.neu.edu/bin/listinfo/larceny-users
