Leigh Sharpe wrote:
Seems that the example I gave actually works, but not the way I'm using it.
I am bridging VLAN tagged packets,
Try protocol 8021q or whatever its number is - if there are other
protocol filters you will need a different prio or you will get an error.
but for some reason they are not being subjected to the rate limit. If I
pass normal, untagged packets through this setup, it behaves as
expected. However, once I put tagged packets through the bridge, it
fails to shape traffic.
I don't want to have to use VLAN sub-interfaces, because the VLAN code strips
the 802.1q tag from packets before they can be examined, which causes me
problems in other areas.
Are these wireless customers?
I've never shaped wireless - do you get alot of extra loss from link
layer, what's the bandwidth, single duplex or is it round robin type?
I wonder if htb tweaked/untweaked/hfsc/policers could be better than cbq
- you may be able to get things better for link latyer, tcpdumps will
show you how bursty things are for users.
Andy.
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
