I had followed that discussion, but my doubt remains. For MASQUERADE too, it depends on the 'src' parameter, which was configured statically. But after the interface comes up with a new address, the initial configuration will be invalid because 'src' is not correct anymore, it seems...Or have I have misunderstood the concept?
-----Original Message----- From: Manish Kathuria [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 1:36 PM To: Salim S I Cc: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [LARTC] DGD patch not detecting dead gateway On 5/11/07, Salim S I <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have a doubt. If you use such a script monitoring the link status with > ping and then reconfiguring, why do you need the DGD patch? You need to do > some reconfiguration (change multipath to a single default route) anyway if > you use the script, right? The patches take care of many other issues also. Please refer to the archives here: http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2007q1/020403.html -- Manish Kathuria Tux Technologies http://www.tuxtechnologies.co.in/ _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
