Sean,

You've given us a lot to think about.

I'll be mostly offline until January 3, but I'll be thihking about thi and I hope to have some answers for you then.

Thanks for your enthusiastic participation!

Regards,

jrs

On Dec 30, 2005, at 4:00 PM, Sean Wheller wrote:

On Friday 30 December 2005 16:26, John Sundman wrote:
The sources to the documentation are in (all paths relative to the top
lps dirctory):

<snip what="Description of documentation src locations"/>

OK, it's as I thought, the doc system is a propriety solution XHTML-like in
source.

While the current system works, I think that getting to know it and enhance upon it will be prohibitive for most people. When I say most people, I take it that the willing author will have some technical knowledge or would not be
editing the XHTML sources in the first place.

With few people understanding how it is hung together, it will also be a bottleneck in an open development environment. Sticking to a standard will open the opportunity for writing docs and enhancing the processing system.

It would, IMHO, be a better solution to adopt Docbook as the standard format.
The DTD is documented and so are the stylesheets. I see some of the
processing tool chain is already in SVN. As most of the project is Java I
would say the following environment would fit right in:

Ant (or GNU Make)
Saxon (enabled extensions)
FOP (enabled extensions)
Docbook DTD
Docbook XSL

DITA may also be a solution. Although I am not yet happy to use it on
production systems, if the project is willing to eat dog food, then so am
I :-)

I see lots of duplication in content and the need to repurpose content for
different readers. There are a number of techniques we can use to help
overcome the problems.

If I was to think of a way forward, I would suggest we do a test run.
Implement a short, but reasonably complex, document into docbook and build the batch processing and custom layer systems for it (PDF, HTML (single page and chunked)). That way we can get to grips with the difficulties together.

The reference manual can be made allot easier to maintain and develop if we modularize the documentation into components and normalize across the doc
system.

The risk. Can we document the next release and complete the new doc system before the next release? If we have enough time. I estimate that we can do the transformation to the new system by end of January. What is the release
schedule?

Let's start the new year with a challenge :-)

Happy New Year.

--
Sean Wheller
Technical Author
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+27-84-854-9408
http://www.inwords.co.za

_______________________________________________
Laszlo-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev

Reply via email to