On Saturday 31 December 2005 22:04, Benjamin Shine wrote: > On Dec 31, 2005, at 11:12 AM, Sean Wheller wrote: > > If John is OK, then the changes are pretty intrusive and we are > > liable to > > break the build in a few places. I like to commit often, keeps it > > open for > > comment and on course, then branching for this would be a good > > idea. Even if > > the timeline is not a problem. > > How does the platform team deal with external contributors using svn, > internal contributors using perforce?
Ah ... this will require commit accounts for anyone involved. The nature and scope of the changes are dramatic. It will hamper the speed of the work process if we have to use a proxy-committer to update the repository. Most of the work is limited to the docs/ so any problems will be topical. Branching will further insulate and the rest is just a leap of faith to place trust in the rcs. Hack the src and let svn take care of the rest. :-) BTW. While we are on the subject. Which dir in svn should I be looking at? There is lsp/ and then lsp-devel/ Where is the trunk (HEAD) development taking place? -- Sean Wheller Technical Author [EMAIL PROTECTED] +27-84-854-9408 http://www.inwords.co.za _______________________________________________ Laszlo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev
