Heh. C is portable assembly language. Does that make Javascript portable bytecodes?
On 2006-06-03, at 16:47 EDT, Jim Grandy wrote: > > On Jun 3, 2006, at 10:07 AM, Benjamin Shine wrote: > >> Would you plan to be compiling to C# source code, which would then go >> through the .NET compiler? Or would you want to modify the compiler >> to emit CLR bytecode? (It's been a year since I worked with .NET; >> correct me if I am reasoning with flawed memories.) > > I think the more interesting direction would be to compile to > JScript.NET, which has elements of JavaScript 2 already in it, and > target either GDI+ or PFW. Note that we are still a few months away > from generating any JS2 language features (principally type > declarations), so it would be good to treat JScript.NET as a JS1 > language as far as possible for now. > _______________________________________________ > Laszlo-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev _______________________________________________ Laszlo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev
