Let's invest in getting it right rather than backing it out. This is the kind of thing that incurs incremental long-term cost if we don't try to make it as clean as possible.
Perhaps Tucker and Henry can look at this today, with an eye toward Henry being able to fix any further issues that come up this week. jim On Jun 19, 2006, at 9:01 AM, P T Withington wrote: > I took out the hack that pretended that dhtml was a swf runtime. It > isn't. I guess there is more crap to root out. It would be sad to > have to put the hack back. > > The speed is just r1049. Henry knows as well as I that the mechanism > for adding a new runtime is messy and we just try to make it a little > cleaner each time. Clearly some of my clean up uncovered some baling > wire and twine... > > On 2006-06-19, at 09:33 EDT, Benjamin Shine wrote: > >> Tucker, I think this one's you: >> lztest: >> [exec] Entering runlztest.sh with LPS_HOME=/home/svnbuild/ >> builds/1056-openlaszlo-branches-legals >> [exec] testing test/lztest/lztest-node.lzx .............. >> [exec] including xml test/lztest/../../lps/utils/ >> lztestmanager.lzx >> [exec] Compilation errors occurred: >> [exec] lztest-node.lzx:1:9: 'dhtml' is not a SWF runtime >> >> Maybe we've been rushing you too much through the compiler switch >> work? Can you bring Henry and me up to speed on it (maybe more >> Henry than me) before you empumpkinate? >> >> Begin forwarded message: >> >> <tail-1056-branches-legals-nightly.log> >> >> benjamin shine >> software engineer >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Laszlo-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev _______________________________________________ Laszlo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev
