Did this, with help from bshine. A
On Nov 22, Jim Grandy wrote: > Please also file a bug, and check the test file in to > http://svn.openlaszlo.org/test/bugs/. Otherwise this won't be regressed or > show up in release notes or be a candidate for unit testing! > > On Nov 21, 2006, at 6:25 PM, Sarah Allen wrote: > > > > > Good catch! The change looks good. Please check in the test file in > > /test/lps/lztrack/... ideally with some text on the canvas that says what > > to look for. > > > > Sarah > > > > On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 6:08 PM, Adam Wolff wrote: > > > > > Summary: Here's a quick fix for LzTrack in trunk. The old code referred to > > > view's > > > "depth" property, which has been renamed to __LZdepth. The enclosed > > > testcase shows the bug and is corrected by the fix. > > > > > > New Features: > > > > > > Bugs Fixed: > > > (No bug number -- see enclosed testcase) > > > > > > Technical Reviewer: sarah allen(pending) > > > QA Reviewer: (pending) > > > Doc Reviewer: (pending) > > > > > > Documentation: > > > > > > Release Notes: > > > > > > Details: > > > Code in LzTrack had rotted > > > > > > Tests: > > > brokenTrack.lzx (not for checkin) > > > > > > Files: > > > WEB-INF/lps/lfc/services/LzTrack.as > > > > > > svn diff services/LzTrack.as > > > Index: services/LzTrack.as > > > =================================================================== > > > --- services/LzTrack.as (revision 2409) > > > +++ services/LzTrack.as (working copy) > > > @@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ > > > btemp = btemp.immediateparent; > > > } > > > // a and b are siblings, check depth > > > - if (atemp.depth > btemp.depth) return a; > > > + if (atemp.__LZdepth > btemp.__LZdepth) return a; > > > else return b; > > > } > > >
