Hmm, those instructions seem to be what "fscommand" is getting compiled to,
the code generator says

       if ("fscommand".equals(name) && arglen == 2) {
         assert args[0] instanceof ASTLiteral;
         Object v = translateLiteralNode(args[0]);
         assert v instanceof String;
         collector.push("FSCommand:" + v);
         visitExpression(args[1]);
         collector.emit(Instructions.GetURL2);
         return true;
       }

Tucker, Max, what's the story with that? Why does fscommand equate to a
GetURL2 tag?


On 2/7/07, strk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 12:27:46PM -0500, Henry Minsky wrote:
> What error are you seeing from Flasm? The only warning I see is that it
> complains about getURL2 not being a known tag, which I figured was just
due
> to flasm being out of date, not due to a alignment error.

Same here:

Unknown getURL2 flag: 0x0
Unknown getURL2 flag: 0x497
Unknown getURL2 flag: 0x4a3
Unknown getURL2 flag: 0x0

Do those flags actually make sense ?
Also, I see many calls to Object.addProperty() with only 2 args, which
seem
invalid to me. Are them intentional, and are they known to work ? How ?

--strk;

>
>
>
> On 2/7/07, strk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >Sorry, stripped you from the recipients list.
> >
> >----- Forwarded message from strk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----
> >
> >Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 17:34:45 +0100
> >From: strk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Subject: Re: [Laszlo-dev] [Gnash-dev] YouTube video via OpenLaszlo
> >To: gnash-dev Mailing List <[email protected]>
> >X-BeenThere: [email protected]
> >
> >On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 09:12:36AM -0500, P T Withington wrote:
> >> Does the file flasm? Or does flasm complain too?
> >
> >flasm complains too. And Ming as well.
> >I just committed a patch that seems to survive that malformation, but
> >other problems occur so o I'm not sure about the fix. The best way
> >to verify would be producing a much simpler SWF.
> >
> >BTW, the other problems seem to be in DEFINESHAPE3 handling.
> >There is actually NO difference from DEFINESHAPE2 in the way Gnash
handles
> >it
> >so it's surely a Gnash problem. If you can provide a simple SWF (a
single
> >shape)
> >compiled in SWF6 and SWF7 ((or whatever SWF version instruduced
> >DEFINESHAPE3) that might
> >help tracking differences.
> >
> >--strk;
> >
> >>
> >> On 2007-02-06, at 21:44 EST, Henry Minsky wrote:
> >>
> >> >On the file I sent you, can you figure out which instruction it
> >> >what choking
> >> >on (i.e., the byte offset into the uncompressed swf file?). I can
> >> >send you
> >> >an uncompressed swf if that would make it easier.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >On 2/6/07, Rob Savoye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>Henry Minsky wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>  On every single one of them I get this error still:
> >> >>> 17:30:50: ERROR: swf_event::read(), event_length = 111, but read
> >> >>110
> >> >>So then nothing else gets parsed right, so we'll have to look into
> >> >>it.
> >> >>
> >> >>        - rob -
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >--
> >> >Henry Minsky
> >> >Software Architect
> >> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Gnash-dev mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev
> >
> >--
> >
> >()   ASCII Ribbon Campaign
> >/\   Keep it simple!
> >
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Gnash-dev mailing list
> >[email protected]
> >http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev
> >
> >----- End forwarded message -----
> >
> >--
> >
> >()   ASCII Ribbon Campaign
> >/\   Keep it simple!
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Henry Minsky
> Software Architect
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--

()   ASCII Ribbon Campaign
/\   Keep it simple!




--
Henry Minsky
Software Architect
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to