Right, well there's definitely precedent. So you should proceed, and
I'll file a bug that we aren't documenting these classes properly.
jim
On May 29, 2007, at 1:22 PM, Philip Romanik wrote:
I see what you mean. LzIdle is written like this and it is listed
as LzIdleClass in the reference guide. LzTimer is listed as both
LzTimer and LzTimerClass.
Phil
Hrm, this will mean that the Reference Guide will document
LzTrackClass and not LzTrack. Not sure how to work around that...
On May 29, 2007, at 11:32 AM, Philip Romanik wrote:
> Change 20070529-Philip-6 by [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2007-05-29 14:15:49
> EST
> in /cygdrive/f/laszlo/svn/src/svn/openlaszlo/branches/legals
> for http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/branches/legals
>
> Summary: Ported LzTrack.lzs to new class system
>
> New Features:
>
> Bugs Fixed: LPP-3986
>
> Technical Reviewer: ptw
> QA Reviewer: (pending)
> Doc Reviewer: (pending)
>
> Documentation:
>
> Release Notes:
>
> Details:
> Ported LzTrack.lzx to the new class system. LzTrack is a singleton
> class but is written more like an ordinary class. To minimize the
> changes I made (and to make it 100% compatible with the old
> version), the class name is LzTrackClass. At the bottom of the file
> is:
>
> /** The single instance of this class
> * @access private
> */
> var LzTrack = new LzTrackClass;
>
>
>
> Tests:
> lzpix in swf and dhtml. The best test in this app is to drag an
> image into the clip region. When I first ported LzTrack the image
> disappeared when I released the mouse.
>
> Run these in swf and dhtml: http://localhost:8080/legals/test/lfc/
> lztrack/trackgroups.lzx
> http://localhost:8080/legals/test/lfc/lztrack/trackgroup.lzx
>
> Files:
> M WEB-INF/lps/lfc/services/LzTrack.lzs
>
> Changeset: http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/patches/20070529-
> Philip-6.tar
>
>
