For example something like:
<!--- Returns value.
@return *: the value to use for this parameter -->
<method name="getValue">
return this.value;
</method>
And I've just spotted a minor spelling mistake:
Value to use for "parameter".
- <!--- Value to use for paramter. A getValue() method can be declared
+ <!--- Value to use for paramter. A <code>getValue()</code> method can
be declared
On 11/14/2008 4:00 PM, Lou Iorio wrote:
Ah, so what should this be?
<!--- Returns value.
@return String: the string representing the value. -->
<method name="getValue">
return this.value;
</method>
On Nov 13, 2008, at 6:33 PM, André Bargull wrote:
Not approved, because lz.param#getValue() may return any type, not
just strings (the value-attribute is an expression not a string, too!).
The limitation for String does only apply to LzParam aka lz.Param aka
lz.params, but not to lz.param! (hey, I didn't choose those names...)
(Ghost used LzParam and they wondered why it just returns strings in
swf9, and they said the documentation does not cover this aspect, but
they used the wrong reference: lz.param instead of LzParam.)
Change 20081113-lou-C by [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
on 2008-11-13 11:42:04 AST
in /Users/lou/src/svn/openlaszlo/trunk
for http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/trunk
Summary: lz.param: clarify return type in the reference, fix nav pane
entries
Bugs Fixed: LPP-7327, LPP-7323
Technical Reviewer: (pending)
QA Reviewer: (pending)
Doc Reviewer: Tucker
Details: document that getValue() returns String
move lz.param to RCP category
add lz.Param to Data category
Tests: visual verify
Files:
M docs/src/nav/toc.xml
M lps/components/rpc/rpc.lzx
Changeset:
http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/patches/20081113-lou-C.tar
