If I have a vote, I agree.
On Nov 15, 2008, at 7:45 AM, André Bargull wrote:
I vote for renaming lz.param to lz.rpcparam (or something similar),
because lz.param is just part of the rpc-classes whereas LzParam is
a general class defined in the LFC and used in almost every
application (so any renaming would have a greater impact).
On 11/14/2008 5:49 PM, P T Withington wrote:
Can we also have a bug to either have a disambiguation page like
Wikipedia, or to change the name of one of these things? This is
crazy.
On 2008-11-13, at 17:33EST, André Bargull wrote:
Not approved, because lz.param#getValue() may return any type, not
just strings (the value-attribute is an expression not a string,
too!).
The limitation for String does only apply to LzParam aka lz.Param
aka lz.params, but not to lz.param! (hey, I didn't choose those
names...)
(Ghost used LzParam and they wondered why it just returns strings
in swf9, and they said the documentation does not cover this
aspect, but they used the wrong reference: lz.param instead of
LzParam.)
Change 20081113-lou-C by [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2008-11-13 11:42:04
AST
in /Users/lou/src/svn/openlaszlo/trunk
for http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/trunk
Summary: lz.param: clarify return type in the reference, fix nav
pane entries
Bugs Fixed: LPP-7327, LPP-7323
Technical Reviewer: (pending)
QA Reviewer: (pending)
Doc Reviewer: Tucker
Details: document that getValue() returns String
move lz.param to RCP category
add lz.Param to Data category
Tests: visual verify
Files:
M docs/src/nav/toc.xml
M lps/components/rpc/rpc.lzx
Changeset: http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/patches/20081113-lou-C.tar
