Yeah, that's better, I'll change the string. On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 11:00 AM, P T Withington <p...@laszlosystems.com>wrote:
> [laszlo-reviews -> laszlo-dev] > > I'll try to look at this in just a bit, but I had a thought: > > I wonder if instead of `anonymous` we should use `singleton`, I think that > might be more descriptive/accurate. An "instance class" as we have been > calling it is really an instance of a singleton class, a class that will > only ever have this one instance as a member, so we don't give it a tag name > (which is why we think of it as anonymous). -- Henry Minsky Software Architect hmin...@laszlosystems.com
