Might as well change this too:
Index: LzNode.lzs
===================================================================
--- LzNode.lzs (revision 15195)
+++ LzNode.lzs (working copy)
@@ -2215,7 +2215,7 @@
// '.' prefix, over tagname, as it will be more specific.
var nct = node.constructor.tagname;
if (!nct) {
- path = 'anonymous';
+ path = 'singleton';
} else {
path = nct;
var sn = parent.subnodes;
On 2009-11-20, at 14:27, Henry Minsky wrote:
> Yeah, that's better, I'll change the string.
>
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 11:00 AM, P T Withington
> <p...@laszlosystems.com>wrote:
>
>> [laszlo-reviews -> laszlo-dev]
>>
>> I'll try to look at this in just a bit, but I had a thought:
>>
>> I wonder if instead of `anonymous` we should use `singleton`, I think that
>> might be more descriptive/accurate. An "instance class" as we have been
>> calling it is really an instance of a singleton class, a class that will
>> only ever have this one instance as a member, so we don't give it a tag name
>> (which is why we think of it as anonymous).
>
>
>
>
> --
> Henry Minsky
> Software Architect
> hmin...@laszlosystems.com
