Good point. Back to anonymous?
Is there a better term? On 2009-11-20, at 17:07, André Bargull wrote: > I disagree about this point: > I wouldn't call it a `singleton`, because in case of replication the > "instance class" might have multiple instances and therefore isn't a > singleton. > > >> [laszlo-reviews -> laszlo-dev] >> >> I'll try to look at this in just a bit, but I had a thought: >> >> I wonder if instead of `anonymous` we should use `singleton`, I think that >> might be more descriptive/accurate. An "instance class" as we have been >> calling it is really an instance of a singleton class, a class that will >> only ever have this one instance as a member, so we don't give it a tag name >> (which is why we think of it as anonymous).
