I didn't like 'anonymous' at all. I was thinking of 'instance-class' but that's pretty un-informative too.
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 5:03 PM, P T Withington <p...@pobox.com> wrote: > Good point. > > Back to anonymous? > > Is there a better term? > > On 2009-11-20, at 17:07, André Bargull wrote: > > > I disagree about this point: > > I wouldn't call it a `singleton`, because in case of replication the > "instance class" might have multiple instances and therefore isn't a > singleton. > > > > > >> [laszlo-reviews -> laszlo-dev] > >> > >> I'll try to look at this in just a bit, but I had a thought: > >> > >> I wonder if instead of `anonymous` we should use `singleton`, I think > that might be more descriptive/accurate. An "instance class" as we have > been calling it is really an instance of a singleton class, a class that > will only ever have this one instance as a member, so we don't give it a tag > name (which is why we think of it as anonymous). > > -- Henry Minsky Software Architect hmin...@laszlosystems.com
