Yes, agree with Tucker. If you want a SOLO app, an index.html is a good option as well.
But when you are testing widgets, it would come in handy to be able to generate the whole widget packet exploded into one folder, returning the config.xml. That's the way you could directly load an OL app into a browser emulator like Ripple. Using lzt=widget for example. On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 9:37 PM, P T Withington <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes we should do this. > > See http://jira.openlaszlo.org/jira/browse/LPP-9148 > > I think it is right to use index.html. It seems much more likely that > someone will be making a widget than a solo app. If they are really making a > solo app, they are more likely to be writing a custom wrapper page. > > On 2010-08-05, at 15:32, Henry Minsky wrote: > >> The W3C widget format is a standard, and very close to what we're emitting >> for SOLO zip archives. >> >> Should we just switch the SOLO deployer scripts over to the W3C format ? >> >> The only difference that I can see at the moment Opera (the only browser >> that runs widgets that I know of) >> requires currently that the start file be named as "index.html", whereas >> we've been making the solo deployer generate >> a file named "yourapp.lzx.html". >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Henry Minsky >> Software Architect >> [email protected] > > >
