I like that idea! lzt=widget On 2010-08-05, at 19:01, Raju Bitter wrote:
> Yes, agree with Tucker. If you want a SOLO app, an index.html is a > good option as well. > > But when you are testing widgets, it would come in handy to be able to > generate the whole widget packet exploded into one folder, returning > the config.xml. That's the way you could directly load an OL app into > a browser emulator like Ripple. Using lzt=widget for example. > > On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 9:37 PM, P T Withington <[email protected]> wrote: >> Yes we should do this. >> >> See http://jira.openlaszlo.org/jira/browse/LPP-9148 >> >> I think it is right to use index.html. It seems much more likely that >> someone will be making a widget than a solo app. If they are really making >> a solo app, they are more likely to be writing a custom wrapper page. >> >> On 2010-08-05, at 15:32, Henry Minsky wrote: >> >>> The W3C widget format is a standard, and very close to what we're emitting >>> for SOLO zip archives. >>> >>> Should we just switch the SOLO deployer scripts over to the W3C format ? >>> >>> The only difference that I can see at the moment Opera (the only browser >>> that runs widgets that I know of) >>> requires currently that the start file be named as "index.html", whereas >>> we've been making the solo deployer generate >>> a file named "yourapp.lzx.html". >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Henry Minsky >>> Software Architect >>> [email protected] >> >> >>
