Thanks for starting this thread. I'm re-naming it to be a bit more positive. I'd like to see it as an "organization" on github then it is easier for a few of us to be administrators.
Sarah On Dec 5, 2011, at 12:44 PM, Raju Bitter wrote: > Thanks, Tucker. It's good to know that the source is available on > sourceforge, thanks for making that happen. I think Max has a script > somewhere to update his Github repository: > https://github.com/mcarlson/openlaszlo > >> From what I'm hearing there's still enough interest in the technology > to have an active community do basic maintenance work, in case Laszlo > is not interested in or capable of doing that in the future. Maybe > it's time to reach out to the active community members to see if > there's enough momentum to continue development on either sourceforge > or Github. > > On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 4:00 PM, P T Withington <[email protected]> wrote: >> It worries me to. At least there is a mirror of the sources on sourceforge. >> Sorry I didn't get one on github. >> >> On Dec 5, 2011, at 2:04, Raju Bitter <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> It seems that Laszlo finally stopped working on OpenLaszlo. There >>> haven't been any checkins to the platform since October 21st 2011. And >>> there haven't been any nightly builds since the same day. >>> >>> Based on the mailing list activity in the past months, the team size >>> must be down to 1-2 people, probably not working full-time on the >>> project - if at all. As a long time supporter, contributor, committer >>> I'd appreciate an update on the status of the project. >>> >>> I don't care about a specific release date for 5.0. But does that mean >>> that Laszlo discontinues OpenLaszlo?
