Ok. I approve this change.

Let's make an improvement for a debugger inspector. I thing it would be really nice to have an inspect pane that displayed the equivalent of Debug.inspect in a way that maintained forwad/back and allowed hiding/showing different levels, etc. Maybe even a search option to find attributes by name.

On Jun 1, 2010, at 13:12, André Bargull <[email protected]> wrote:

I like the idea of making the inspector a part of the debugger. (For some reason the name 'Firebug' comes to my mind ;-) ). It could be a real help for users and developers.

But I wouldn't add the current inspector as is to the debugger. We should first gather some ideas which we'd like to have for a debugger-integrated inspector. An integrated inspector could also use private methods like __typeof without worrying whether to make the methods publicly available.

That said, I'd like to commit this change without further updates. Some reasons for this: 1) no need to think about how to use advanced methods of the debugger, as for example __typeof, which may need to be made public 2) the current inspector even works with debug disabled, this wouldn't be possible if __typeof was used

So this is more like a quick fix until we've got something better...


On 6/1/2010 5:46 PM, P T Withington wrote:
Would it be better to make the Debugger.__typeof interface public (maybe with a better name) and use that instead? That would make this code more future-proof.

Even better, should we make the inspector a standard part of the debugger? Make it a pane that you can open in the debug window? Integrate it with Debug.inspect?

On 2010-05-31, at 13:36, André Bargull wrote:

Change 20100531-bargull-EWW by barg...@bargull02 on 2010-05-31 19:19:57
in /home/anba/src/svn/openlaszlo/trunk
for http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/trunk

Summary: some updates for the inspector to handle anonymous classes better

Bugs Fixed: LPP-9060 (inspector: no proper tagname for anonymous classes and debug window not hidden)

Technical Reviewer: ptw
QA Reviewer: (pending)

Details:
The inspector needs to display the proper tagname, "<anonymous>" won't help anyone here. There are now two additional methods: - getTagName(): returns constructor.tagname if defined, otherwise checks for anonymous classes by inspecting the classname and in case of anon classes returns the superclass' tagname - getDisplayName(): returns getTagName() if not null, otherwise returns the classname

Two retrieve the superclass and the classname, separate definitions are needed for swf8/dhtml and swf9+

Also updated switch clause to use the new tagname of the debugger.


Tests:
inspector-example works

Files:
M lps/components/utils/diagnostic/inspector/inspector.lzx

Changeset: http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/patches/20100531-bargull-EWW.tar




Reply via email to