I understand what you are trying to do.

I'm not sure I see how it can work though, since the user could have set a 
custom acceleration curve for this?

When you say "This is the same mechanism used by Flash." are you saying Flash 
documents a scale factor for each browser and we are trying to be compatible 
with that?  If that's the case, then I am more convinced of this being a 
reasonable change.

On 2010-09-22, at 15:14, Max Carlson wrote:

> I was just trying to get it to be consistent across browsers.  This is the 
> same mechanism used by Flash.  If you don't like the change let's leave it 
> as-is!
> 
> On 9/22/10 4:33 AM, P T Withington wrote:
>> I guess this is a personal preference.  Safari seems slow to me now.
>> 
>> Do we really want to be doing this?  Won't this make OL apps look "sluggish" 
>> compared with other apps?  If Safari and Firefox have different mouse 
>> behavior, I would think we would want OL apps to follow the browser, not try 
>> to subvert it.
>> 
>> You ought to update your tools so you get the new improved patch names.
>> 
>> On 2010-09-14, at 16:46, Max Carlson wrote:
>> 
>>> Change 20100914-maxcarlson-M by maxcarl...@friendly on 2010-09-14 13:43:16 
>>> PDT
>>>    in /Users/maxcarlson/openlaszlo/trunk-clean
>>>    for http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/trunk
>>> 
>>> Summary: Fix mousewheel speeds to be more consistent.
>>> 
>>> Bugs Fixed: LPP-9369 - Safari OSX: mousewheel way to fast
>>> 
>>> Technical Reviewer: hminsky
>>> QA Reviewer: ptw
>>> 
>>> Details: mousewheel - Compensate for Safari 5's huge mousewheel delta 
>>> values, make Firefox a little quicker.
>>> 
>>> embednew - Add explicit scoping for handler registration/unregistration.
>>> 
>>> Tests: test/lfc/legals/keyboardandmouse.lzx?lzr=dhtml&lzt=html shows normal 
>>> mousewheel speed in Safari and Firefox.
>>> 
>>> Files:
>>> M       lps/includes/source/mousewheel.js
>>> M       lps/includes/source/embednew.js
>>> 
>>> Changeset: 
>>> http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/patches/20100914-maxcarlson-M.tar
>> 
> 


Reply via email to