Interesting! I didn't know about the special status of "new:". Is
this usage documented? It isn't mentioned in Chapter 33 except by use
in the example.
But I do think it no longer works, or perhaps it doesn't work the way
it would need to in the example -- where a "contact" node would have
to be automatically created within the dataset for the entry fields
to be visible.
Now that we have local datasets, do we need this notation anymore?
jim
ps I've added your comment to the bug (LPP-1284).
On Jan 3, 2006, at 10:11 AM, Adam Wolff wrote:
yes, the xpath expression new:/ is special. It's supposed to create an
anonymous local dataset, although I don't know how well that
functionality
has been maintained (i.e. there may be bugs with it now.) The
proper way
to create an anonymous localdataset is to use the tag that's new in
3.1.
A
On Jan 3, mt1 wrote:
Hi all
In the user's guide example 33.23, if i use the other datapath name,
something like
"aa:/contact", instead of "new:/contact", the debugger shows
"couldn't
find dataset
for aa:/contact". Dose the "new:/" datapath special key word?
Thanks
m1
_______________________________________________
Laszlo-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-user
_______________________________________________
Laszlo-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-user
_______________________________________________
Laszlo-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-user
