I've been having problems over the last few days trying to install latex2html locally in my home directory of a system with a global installation of teTeX. latex2html itself seems fine, but I am having terrible trouble getting dvips, when run through latex2html, to find psfrag.pro, which is a locally installed latex package. I cannot edit the main installation files, just local ones. To get dvips to find the file when running by hand just required it to be in my tex working directory, but this is not good enough for latex2html. I have been playing with the TEXINPUTS environment variable, both in latex2html (through .latex2html-init) and in the shell - but to no avail - Does TEXINPUTS affect dvips anyway? I've also tried the -h<<path>/psfrag.pro>, again to no avail. Are there any docs (I've generated and read the manual supplied) which could help me more on this? % setenv [snip] TEXINPUTS=/u1.bath/s11/sb314/thesis:.:/usr/sol2b/teTeX/texmf/tex/latex/base :/usr/sol2b/teTeX/texmf/tex/latex/graphics: [this lets latex work normally, plus points to psfrag.pro as shown below] % ls /u1.bath/s11/sb314/thesis [snip] psfrag.pro [snip] % more /u1.bath/s11/sb314/thesis/.latex2html-init $DVIPS = 'dvips -d97 -h/u1.bath/s11/sb314/thesis/psfrag.pro'; $TEXINPUTS = '/u1.bath/s11/sb314/thesis::.'; $DESTDIR = '/u1.bath/s11/sb314/public_html/thesis'; I can bypass this problem by trying to run latex2html, letting it fail, then copying psfrag.pro to the DESTDIR and running again, but I would like to use '-reuse 0' each time. (BTW REUSE = 0 in .latex2html-init causes latex2html to fail, whereas '-reuse 0' on the command line works as documented (98.1p1)). But the figures produced are not correct, there are just a group of text strings where the figure should be in the .html doc. I have looked into the temporary image files created and the .ps and .ppm files seem to be blank. Equations and inline images are more-or-less OK. On a similar note, I also rely heavily on the subfigure package in my documents. These figures also do not output correctly. From what I have read shouldn't the whole subfigure environment be sent to latex to produce a gif (in my case)? This does not seem to be the case. Hoping for some enlightenment Ed
