On 4/25/2010 4:35 PM, James Westby wrote:
Do you have an example of an element that has both param and
representation_type?
Nope. That's why am asking whether such a situation can exist?
If this is a theoretical question that I think you can assume this.
I think the fuller implementation would be that the parameters defined
directly and those in the representation types would never overlap, so
that
param foo
representation_type A
param bar
representation_type B
param baz
This means that we have two overloads for this methods . This corrosponds to
methodname(foo, bar)
methodname(foo,baz)
What am considering is that the child of request can contain either
param[] or representation_type[] , not both together, which makes
param foo1
param foo2
param foo3
AND
representation_type foo1
representation_type foo2
representation_type foo3
LEGAL
WHEREAS
param foo1
representation_type foo2
param foo3
representation_type foo4
representation_type foo5
IS ILLEGAL.
More info is is here
http://www.w3.org/Submission/wadl/#x3-180002.9
which says that as per the schema param[] and representation_type[]
exist together and what I marked ILLEGAL is actually legal as per the
schema.
Confusion escalated. :(
would be legal, but
param foo
representation_type A
param foo
would not be. The specification doesn't seem to be explicit about this
though.
P.S: Sorry for use of ALLCAPS for a few words. It was just for emphasis.
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
