On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 16:52:06 +0530, Manish Sinha <[email protected]> wrote: > > If this is a theoretical question that I think you can assume this. > > I think the fuller implementation would be that the parameters defined > > directly and those in the representation types would never overlap, so > > that > > > > param foo > > representation_type A > > param bar > > representation_type B > > param baz > > > > This means that we have two overloads for this methods . This corrosponds to > > methodname(foo, bar) > methodname(foo,baz)
No, it means that the method takes any/all of the union of the parameters defined directly with param or as part of a representation. Meaning in this case the method signature would be methodname(foo, bar, baz) Thanks, James _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
