On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 10:24:37 Jonathan Lange wrote: > On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Gary Poster <[email protected]> > wrote: ... > > > I understand and appreciate your/Jono's/Francis' perspective, but > > personally am not swayed from my original position. I'm happy to go > > along with the consensus or however the decision is made, but I felt it > > was worth expressing my concerns. > > To clarify, I have no strong opinion on this matter. I like the > general structure of Rob's bug triage proposal, but I doubt that using > either Critical or High for oopses, timeouts and regressions will make > an actual difference in day-to-day work on Launchpad.
Only in my historical feeling of "Oh crap!" when seeing a critical bug and feeling like I should drop everything to fix it. I like the simplicity of Critical bugs need incident reports. But perhaps that is just me and Curtis. Tim _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
