On March 8, 2011, Deryck Hodge wrote: > On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Aaron Bentley <[email protected]> wrote: > > So "people set bad links regularly" means we have the first part > > "packaging link", regularly. The second part "translations enabled > > upstream" should be common if the feature we're working on is > > successful. In the absence of hard data, the last part, "a potemplate > > with the same name on both sides" seems rare, but not so rare that we > > should ignore it. If necessary, we could query the database to find out > > more. > > Yeah, this sounds reasonable. At least to know for sure what we're > dealing with. If we're not going to cause much of an issue anyway and > the condition exists infrequently, then we could avoid creating this > barrier until we really see the need for it. > > Just my $.02. I certainly defer to the better judgement of the group on > this.
I'll add my $.02CAN to yours! Launchpad doesn't really need more confusing permission. On the other hand, what about a malicious user removing packaging link on Ubuntu main packages? -- Francis J. Lacoste [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
