On 2 June 2011 23:56, Gary Poster <gary.pos...@canonical.com> wrote: > > On Jun 2, 2011, at 9:39 AM, Deryck Hodge wrote: > >> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Gary Poster <gary.pos...@canonical.com> >> wrote: >>> A warning from experience: beware that our current feature flag story works >>> pretty well for beta testing authenticated users, but not so well for >>> anonymous users. We should be vigilant to make sure that things work for >>> anonymous users before turning flags on for everyone--presumably by turning >>> flags on for everyone on local instances and then on qastaging/staging (as >>> appropriate) and doing some exploratory testing.
Good point. I added a note to <https://dev.launchpad.net/FeatureFlags>; please expand if you can think of anything else. > I'm not sure if we allow all canonical LP devs to change feature flags on > staging and qastaging yet. This would be a use case for it, because we would > want to have exploratory testing both with the "everyone (including anonymous > users) gets the feature flag" and with the "only certain people get the > feature flag" scenarios. There is <https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/790025> asking for developer write access on staging/qastaging, but it does not exist yet. Also http://pad.lv/792125 for an anonymous/non-anonymous scope; and http://pad.lv/666544 for getting a consistent fraction of users. Martin _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : launchpad-dev@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
