-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 11-06-02 05:56 PM, Robert Collins wrote: > On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 1:56 AM, Gary Poster <gary.pos...@canonical.com> wrote: >> Alternatively or in addition, perhaps there's a clever feature flag tweak we >> can do, like looking for a browser cookie that we insert manually in our >> browsers, or something. > > Exactly! > > One of the unrealised intentions of flags was allowing soft-launches > including anonymous users. There are two problems: > - our caching story is probably too aggressive > - we don't have glue to define stuff yet. > > (sketch) > 1) Teach apache to let requests with a cookie like LP_FEATURES through > squid - that is, only treat *other* cookies as needing to bypass > squid. > 2) > Have a scope 'fraction' which takes a %: > advancedsubscriptions.enabled fraction 0 5%
Hmm, when I saw this, I thought it was a mechanism that would allow for devs to control features on staging for *themselves*, by setting a cookie. Perhaps also an interesting idea? Aaron -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk3o5ZIACgkQ0F+nu1YWqI0QtwCgh9q6xLQ0iuFAaYBGWaFgEtJ3 dmcAn161iHX0PYoXL4M04v3nNFNBtkWJ =whlZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : launchpad-dev@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
