On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 1:16 AM, Thomas Hervé <thomas.he...@canonical.com> wrote: > Le 15/06/2011 23:07, Francis J. Lacoste a écrit : >> Elliot suggested today that the Erlang OTP isn't really meant to start >> multiple RabbitMQ instance on the same box. And gave the same suggestion >> than Stuart about how to multiplex test runs: use a variable queue prefix. >> >> That's how U1 is doing it, it seems. > > Note that instead of using queue prefixes, I would use vhosts, which > provides the right level of separation IMHO. The downside is that you > need to redefine ACLs when you create them, though.
Anyone happen to know if some of the projects currently using AMQP with RabbitMQ have considered using XMPP instead? Not that one protocol is necessarily a replacement for the other, but they do share some similar properties. If XMPP happens to suit the requirements for a project, then other services can be considered like ejabberd which might address some of the concerns raised in this thread. -- Marc Tardif _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : launchpad-dev@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
