Excerpts from Marc Tardif's message of Thu Jun 16 20:14:32 -0700 2011: > On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 1:16 AM, Thomas Hervé > <thomas.he...@canonical.com> wrote: > > Le 15/06/2011 23:07, Francis J. Lacoste a écrit : > >> Elliot suggested today that the Erlang OTP isn't really meant to start > >> multiple RabbitMQ instance on the same box. And gave the same suggestion > >> than Stuart about how to multiplex test runs: use a variable queue prefix. > >> > >> That's how U1 is doing it, it seems. > > > > Note that instead of using queue prefixes, I would use vhosts, which > > provides the right level of separation IMHO. The downside is that you > > need to redefine ACLs when you create them, though. > > Anyone happen to know if some of the projects currently using AMQP > with RabbitMQ have considered using XMPP instead? Not that one > protocol is necessarily a replacement for the other, but they do share > some similar properties. If XMPP happens to suit the requirements for > a project, then other services can be considered like ejabberd which > might address some of the concerns raised in this thread. >
The SecondLife guys did a massive evaluation a couple of years ago and basically didn't have time to evaluate XMPP/ejabberd. Their needs were likely *MUCH* different than Launchpad's: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Message_Queue_Evaluation_Notes#XMPP There was also a debate on the rabbitMQ list around the same time: http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/2008-June/000899.html _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : launchpad-dev@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
