On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 2:15 PM, curtis Hovey <curtis.ho...@canonical.com> wrote: ... > You may have noticed that releases are most often done by our beloved > antipodeans. While the work to request a deployment is trivial, the QA > is not. Engineers may sacrifice a considerable amount of time checking > that QA Staging is deployable. They had this time when most of them were > working on maintenance, but all of them are now on feature work. > > I am sure we all appreciate the work done by William, Steven, Ian, and > Robert. Well done. I suspect that no-downtime-deploys would stop if > these gentlemen took a one week holiday, or another large meteor strikes > Au. I think it is time that others arrange for a no-downtime-deploy.
+1 Could non-Canonicalers conceivably arrange for nodowntime deploys? Could Canonical-employed non-Launchpadders do same? Where are the docs on how to do so? cheers, jml _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : launchpad-dev@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
