On 11/08/2011 04:36 AM, Raphaël Badin wrote: > But the main improvement (suggested by lifeless) was done by changing > the UI from: > http://people.canonical.com/~rvb/prev_menu_branches.png to > http://people.canonical.com/~rvb/new_menu_branches.png.
I'll miss the numbers for active reviews. Bugs pages load the numbers async, which I suppose is a lot of work to support for Code pages. The intent of the numbers was to imply vitality and activity. Vitality and activity temporarily had a spark line to show commits into the development focus branch, but the UI/implementation never worked as expected so it was removed. The activity/vitality problem is universal to all aspects of a project--we need a solution that can be applied to code, bugs, blueprints, answers, translations, and release planning. The "N active review" link is a poor call to action. The page must inform the user that contributors need help, maybe the from the user. -- Curtis Hovey http://launchpad.net/~sinzui
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : launchpad-dev@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
