-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 11-11-14 03:18 PM, curtis Hovey wrote:
> On 11/14/2011 03:02 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>> On Nov 14, 2011, at 11:13 AM, Curtis Hovey wrote:
>>
>>> Membership in an exclusive or inclusive team will depend on a
>>> signed agreement. Users, sign agreements, so these teams cannot
>>> contain other teams;
>>
>> Was that a typo? I don't think inclusive team membership should
>> depend on a signed agreement. Isn't that by your previous
>> definition, exclusive?
> There is a use case for an open team (inclusive) to let anyone join
> so long as they obey the code of conduct. Consider the case the the
> Ubuntu code of conduct in Lp, anyone can sign it.
Your phrasing ("will depend") suggests that a signed agreement will
always required to join any inclusive team. While I agree that
requiring a signed agreement can be useful for inclusive teams, I
don't think it should be required for all inclusive teams.
Aaron
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk7Be5MACgkQ0F+nu1YWqI1ukACfSWorswSsAmozy2ZMEznQWIeY
+foAnRz+IiYztdkVjBHaWPC4dk5sSa7X
=PzBe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev
Post to : launchpad-dev@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
