On 11/14/2011 03:35 PM, Aaron Bentley wrote:
> On 11-11-14 03:18 PM, curtis Hovey wrote:
>> On 11/14/2011 03:02 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>>> On Nov 14, 2011, at 11:13 AM, Curtis Hovey wrote:
>>>
>>>> Membership in an exclusive or inclusive team will depend on a
>>>> signed agreement. Users, sign agreements, so these teams cannot
>>>> contain other teams;
>>>
>>> Was that a typo? I don't think inclusive team membership should
>>> depend on a signed agreement. Isn't that by your previous
>>> definition, exclusive?
>
>> There is a use case for an open team (inclusive) to let anyone join
>> so long as they obey the code of conduct. Consider the case the the
>> Ubuntu code of conduct in Lp, anyone can sign it.
>
> Your phrasing ("will depend") suggests that a signed agreement will
> always required to join any inclusive team. While I agree that
> requiring a signed agreement can be useful for inclusive teams, I
> don't think it should be required for all inclusive teams.There is *no* proposal to do this for all teams. Per the thread I referenced, the need to for loco teams that have CoCs, and organisational teams that have license requirements for contributors. -- Curtis Hovey http://launchpad.net/~sinzui
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : launchpad-dev@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
