On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 23:40:08 +1100, Martin Pool <m...@sourcefrog.net> wrote: > So, if I measured correctly (which is not certain) then switching to > m2.xlarge cuts the test run time from 4h40m to 3h40m. Wow, I think > you've just saved people a lot of time.
Yeah, I got an ec2 failure mail (with the error in test_dateDueOldPreviousResult that's being discussed on the list) saying: 16911 tests run in 3:46:21.564715, 0 failures, 1 errors so, yeah, seems like an easy win, and saves us maybe $1 a run to boot :-) When we can land changes again, I guess I should change the default. > My filesystem-tuning things have now built into an AMI in the > Singapore region, but sadly it has a bug. Maybe next time. Here's hoping! Cheers, mwh _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : launchpad-dev@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
