On Thursday 10 November 2011 09:46:31 Martin Pool wrote: > I've just copied what was lib/canonical/buildd into > lp:launchpad-buildd <https://launchpad.net/launchpad-buildd> and soon > I'm going to propose a merge to launchpad that makes this a dependency > and deletes the code from the Launchpad tree. I've already (I think) > removed all the code-level coupling.
\o/ Thanks for doing this Martin! > Still to be done: > * launchpad needs to treat this as a dependency; i'm thinking > probably to make it a dpkg dependency because it's not really a lot > like a python egg I'm not entirely sure it needs to be a run-time dependency; if it is it should be an optional one since the vast majority of LP runs without it. It should definitely be a testing dependency though. I don't know how to do that with dpkg dependencies. > * launchpad needs to call in to it to run its tests We need to be *super* careful that we don't break buildd now it's separate. The coupling between the buildd-manager and the slave code is far too high and it's easily broken :( Cheers J _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : launchpad-dev@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
