On Tuesday 29 November 2011 09:39:13 Martin Pool wrote: > Eventually it would be perhaps good to have a fake implementation that > talks the right protocol (to test lp without buildd), a driver that > talks that protocol to the buildd to test it alone, and then a harness > that tests an entire running system. I think the last is the most > urgent: just answering "did that deployment to staging work or not" is > super complicated and manual and is the place we had a lot of stalls > in deployment. Without that, any introduction of fakes is going to be > risky.
There are already fake buildd objects in the manager tests. This may be good or bad :) _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : launchpad-dev@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
