I did have the same thought as you that if people had private things but no commercial subscription, then too bad, serves them right. William convinced me to - he said that the affected projects are Linaro/Canonial and we would/could be exposing private information. I wasn't winning the argument so thought it best just to make the change.
On Sat 18 Aug 2012 00:21:33 EST, Curtis Hovey wrote: > You have NOT needed to kill the branch. The process that manages the EOL of a > commercial subscription deletes the subscription, sets bugs to public by > default, and ignores BVP. The maintainer was informed that no one can create > private branches anymore. Since we abandoned branch multi-tenancy last year, > any team abusing the existing BVPs should be smacked (and charged $250 USD). > Once we enter beta, the EOL process will set the policies to Public as is > claimed in the email. > > As a commercial-admin, I will set the project's policies to public regardless > of an existing BVP if there is no commercial subscription. -- https://code.launchpad.net/~wallyworld/launchpad/project-sharingpolicy-garbo-job2/+merge/120063 Your team Launchpad code reviewers is subscribed to branch lp:launchpad. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-reviewers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-reviewers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
