On Fri, 2007-08-24 at 10:45 +0100, Matthew Revell wrote: > > > That satisfies me fine, because the packages I'm interested in are; > > although if PPA is provided to people for more systems than Ubuntu > > (Ubuntu derivatives and Debian?), this may become problematic, as I > > think mpt pointed out during the meeting. > > > If that does give rise to problems, I wonder if it might be possible > > to combine references to opensource.org with a reference to GNU > > accepted free licenses [1]. That would cover the licenses I'm > > interested in and hopefully most others. > > > > [1] http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#SoftwareLicenses
Not allowing Creative Commons BY-SA seems really backwards. I'd certainly not allow -NC or -ND as they are non free. Wikipedia uses the GFDL and many other open content projects use CC-BY-SA. Missing these out makes it looks like you don't understand open content licensing. Caroline -- launchpad-users mailing list launchpad-users@lists.canonical.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/launchpad-users
