Using a local for this is not too bad, here it does not involve much
data and I would assume race conditions are not a concern here. If the
second loop is just waiting (using a wait function) it won't use any
CPU time.

Linking the timing of the loops together by using a producer/consumer
model is an option similar to using occurences, but will also enable
data transfer between the loops if that's necessary.

The easiest way to get the two loops to run in separate threads would
probably be to put them in separate VIs and set the VIs to run in
different execution systems.

Reply via email to