I need this capability, too. That is, I want to be able to create a COM-compliant DLL of code that I wrote in LabVIEW. If COM is so great that LabVIEW has ActiveX functions, then why wouldn't I want to use it? And why wouldn't everyone else, even those in my company that are developing code in languages other than LabVIEW?
Or is LabVIEW just another dead-end language, unlike all the prominent platforms that do support creation of COM-compliant DLLs? After all, what good is ActiveX support in LabVIEW if LabVIEW can't even go full circle with itself? That's like a person claiming to be a translator, but upon further questioning, one finds them claiming that they can translate Spanish into English, or English into Spanish, but can't translate Spanish into English & back into Spanish. That is, LV should be able to build a DLL that can be called using the LV ActiveX VIs.
