shoneill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > I understand from Greg McCaskle's answer that this is something which > may come in future (And judging how far LabVIEW has come, I'm sure it > will be incorporated). > > If you're developing code in other languages which create > COM-compliant DLLs, then is it not possible to write a wrapper DLL in > this other language and register this instead... > > I agree that this would be a nice thing to have, but even without it, > LabVIEW has established itself as a powerful tool for test and > measurement. > > If you need ActiveX-enabled DLLs, then at the moment you should use > another language to do it. The right tool for the right job and so > on. > > Shane.
You could build the dll from LV, then wrap it in a COM/ActiveX DLL built in Visual Basic. Jeff
