DocCec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: In a message dated 98-03-10 12:30:48 EST, you write: << ackie - I am so pleased that you are willing to consider this. I agree with what you are posting. Definitely 'energy' is working here, maybe Doc or another lister knows. BTW you have the open and inquiring mind of a true researcher and I think you will be quite a contributor. Ride that null hyothesis! >> Doc has no idea, though she certainly shares your respect for the null hypothesis! Too bad more folks don't. Doc Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
- Re: L&I Re: EMF/Jackie Jackie Fellows
- Re: L&I Re: EMF/Jackie Dr.L.D.Misek-Falkoff
- Re: L&I Re: EMF/Jackie Jackie Fellows
- Re: L&I Re: EMF/Jackie Dr.L.D.Misek-Falkoff
- Re: L&I Re: EMF/Jackie Jackie Fellows
- Re: L&I Re: EMF/Self Estee... Dr.L.D.Misek-Falkoff
- Re: L&I Re: EMF/Self E... Jackie Fellows
- Re: L&I Re: EMF/Jackie DocCec
- Re: L&I Re: EMF/Jackie Steve Wright
- Re: Off Subject Sort of was L&I Re: EMF... Jackie Fellows
- L&I Re: EMF/Jackie William J. Foristal
- Re: L&I Re: EMF/Jackie Jackie Fellows
- L&I Re: EMF/Jackie William J. Foristal
- Re: L&I Re: EMF/Jackie Jackie Fellows
- L&I Re: EMF/Jackie William J. Foristal
- Re: L&I Re: EMF/Jac... Sue Hartigan
- L&I Re: EMF/Jackie William J. Foristal
- Re: L&I Re: EMF/Jac... Sue Hartigan
