Jackie Fellows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
William J. Foristal wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
>
> Hi Jackie,
>
> I think that has always been true about the younger generations unless
> there is a really exciting "cause" to rally around, like civil rights or
> a war to protest.
>
> But it seems to me that those who refuse to admit that the truth USUALLY
> lies somewhere in between (not always, but usually) have a hidden agenda.
> In the case of the Clinton fiasco that agenda is clearly political. Of
> course we can't tell for sure unless we can give them a lie detector
> test. <VBG>
>
> Bill
>
Hi Bill
It is just all that stimuli coming in at once. So much easier to ignore most
of it and just pay attention to that stimuli that supports my preconceived
ideas, right. A lot more efficient uses of my senses and cognitive
processes--besides, not as much work. You know I can't help wondering if the
people involved really know what they believed was the truth when the
situation happened. Retrospective thinking can change the past
tremendously. Just look at when we put labels on people.
jackief
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
