[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Sue,
I think it was just a routine summary of what she did during the days
leading up to the day her husband committed suicide.
Of course, this is no proof that the alleged incident with Clinton did
not happen because she would hardly put that information into the
affidavit.
Bill
On Sat, 21 Mar 1998 19:52:34 -0800 Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
>Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>Hi Bill:
>
>Do you or anyone else know why she made this statement in the first
>place. I know that it was the attorney for the people from whom her
>husband stole the money, that took this affidavit. But I don't know
>why
>he did it.
>
>Sue
>>
>> HI Kathy,
>>
>> That's what makes the statement so damaging to her. No one coerced
>her
>> to say that on the statement. It's what she wrote. Obviously, she
>was
>> mistaken about not meeting with Clinton, but the meaning of the
>statement
>> seems to be that if she had such a horrible experience she would
>have
>> remembered it when she made the statement after her husband's death.
>>
>> Bill
>
>--
>Two rules in life:
>
>1. Don't tell people everything you know.
>2.
>
>Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
>
_____________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
