Jackie Fellows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Hi Sue Hedge your bets?? jackief Sue Hartigan wrote: > Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Hi Bill: > > This thing has gotten so intertwined in lies from all sides, I don't > know how anyone can believe anyone anymore. I know that the minute I > think I have it figured out someone comes up with something to refute > the person or story. > > Maybe that is what they are all trying to do, confuse the issue so much, > that we will all get sick of it, and that will be the end of it. > > Lying under oath, seems to be no big deal here either. > > Look at Monica. Her lawyer said that she would stand by her signed > affidavit *unless* she got immunity. :) What is that, anyway??? > > Sue > > > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
- Re: L&I Question for Kathy Sue Hartigan
- Re: L&I Question for Kathy moonshine
- Re: L&I Question for Kathy Sue Hartigan
- Re: L&I Question for Kathy William J. Foristal
- Re: L&I Question for Kathy Sue Hartigan
- Re: L&I Question for Kathy William J. Foristal
- Re: L&I Question for Kathy Sue Hartigan
- Re: L&I Question for Kathy William J. Foristal
- Re: L&I Question for Kathy Sue Hartigan
- Re: L&I Question for Kathy William J. Foristal
- Re: L&I Question for Kathy Jackie Fellows
- Re: L&I Question for Kathy dr. ldmf [ph.d, j.d.]
- Re: L&I Question for Kathy William J. Foristal
- Re: L&I Question for Kathy Kathy E
- Re: L&I Question for Kathy Sue Hartigan
- Re: L&I Question for Kathy William J. Foristal
- Re: L&I Question for Kathy Sue Hartigan
- Re: L&I Question for Kathy William J. Foristal
- Re: L&I Question for Kathy moonshine
- L&I Re: Kathleen Willey William J. Foristal
- Re: L&I Re: Kathleen Willey Sue Hartigan
